|
![]() |
#1 |
Участник
|
Вот тебе ответ на мой баг (Won't Fix):
Цитата:
This is a well-know limitation due to the existing kernel implementation where only data buffer of the current table can be put in the collection list.
There are two possible work-arounds. 1. use xRecord.buf2con() and con2buf() to pack/unpack all the data buffers in the inheritance chain as container put it in the container. 2. use a class that holds the reference to the table variable, and put the class instance in the collection list. |
|
|
За это сообщение автора поблагодарили: Stitch_MS (5). |