|
|
13.12.2018, 20:30
|
#1 |
|
Banned
|
Что интересно там был Infor и стороной являлась Infor (Steinhausen) II Gmbh. Так и не разобрался самостоятельный это партнер или сам вендор. Но сомневаюсь что их клиента сейчас бы устроило 90 дней просто не тот размер.
Использовали неправильную проектную методологию и неправильный договор по которому их нагнули и только. Ничего системного не вижу. Их нагнули по формальным основаниям за прекращение работ и обрыв контракта. Вот если бы был прецедент по неким техническим или функциональным критериям после Go-Live тогда да, страшно жить. А тут чисто юридическое упражнение по факту одностороннего разрыва контракта. Цитата:
The preparatory work for the procurement began in early 2013, and in the spring of 2014 Infor was selected as supplier. The parties entered into a supply agreement based on the State Standard Agreement, SSA-T.
When a tested version of the system was to be delivered in spring 2015, it was discovered that Infor was not on schedule with its deliveries. Following this, several delivery attempts were made but the system did not satisfy the requirements that had been agreed. In the summer of 2015, Infor proposed to draw up a new plan for the delivery of the system. No such plan was ever presented by Infor and the project made little progress throughout the autumn. In November Infor decided – against Felleskjøpet's wishes – to discontinue its work on the project. As the parties had not succeeded in reaching an agreement on how the project could be continued, Felleskjøpet terminated the agreement and went ahead with a new procurement. At the same time, Felleskjøpet initiated a claim against Infor for compensation for the losses they had incurred as a result of the breach of the agreement. Вот есть Agile Software Development The Norwegian Government's Standard Terms and Conditions for IT Procurement SSA-S https://www.ssb.no/forside/_attachme...ts=155975666f0 |
|
|
Комбинированный вид
